Closed ia closed 1 year ago
And I fully understand that people may be very-very busy with their lives & problems so not having time to update the report is ok but in such case if some issue turned out to be still valid it always can be re-opened easily.
Hello. Just go to TL;DR if you don't want to read my rant :)
Otherwise... I'm kinda relatively new here. Unfortunately I'm not as good in low-level hardware microelectronics as others. But this project is so awesome that I try to help it in every way possible - with docs, scripts, build system, tiny improves in code where I'm capable.
Recently I had some time for the issue tracker itself. I looked through every comment in every opened issue (some of the comments were super-interesting by the way, so many interesting people in the community there), I kid you not! So you wouldn't have to. Because I'm fully aware that the crew is very busy with more important & useful things. However I noticed that there are a lot of opened issues where there is no any update, even from the reporters, even when @discip or @River-Mochi very kindly & very politely asked the reporters to update the info on the report.
Key take-aways from some issues if I would have been asked to summarize:
TL; DR:
Here is a brief list of the opened issues which, in my humble opinion, just should be closed forcefully by the project owners who have the permission to do that:
to close as solved/fixed/implemented:
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/349 - implemented
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/360 - now it's better :)
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/736 - implemented
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1356 - implemented (this info is in the official documentation now)
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1510 - implemented (~I have TS80P with SC7A20 and it works bearable~ funny, with latest fw it says LIS2 clone, lol)
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1552 - implemented
to close as not relevant/out-of-dated:
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/444
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/518 - not IronOS scope
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/564 - there is the table in the official documentation now
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/583 - impossible to implement considering the complexity of hardware when dealing with QC/PD/etc.
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/619 - not IronOS scope
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/628 - just out-of-date
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/504 - should be closed as a duplicate of https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/227 ;)
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/662 - reported version is obsolete & no response from the reporter :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/666 - out-of-dated
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/673 - not relevant
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/698 - it could be a problem with usb cable, usb port, OS drivers for DFU disk... so may not quite relevant to IronOS
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/762 - it's by far not recommended way to power the iron no matter how smart the iron is so not providing compliant QC/PD for TS80P by MBP is a problem of MBP not IronOS
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/810 - discussion, not a bug
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/833 - not relevant
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/839 - probably hardware-related
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/841 - powerbank issue. I have exactly the same powerbank (Tronsmart PBT12, can make a photoproof) - unfortunately it's not fully compatible with declared QC on practice and yes, the same issue with my TS80P regardless powerpulse settings (did try a lot of possible combinations though) on IronOS - PBT12 keeps turning off.
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/907 - there is no software nor hardware which would replace safety first approach. :)
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1032 - no response from the reporter :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1376 - no response from the reporter :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1394 - not IronOS scope: the firmware is not capable to implement in hardware QC3 for MHP30 - MHP30 manufacturer declares PD support only
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1411 - unclear report, no response :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1419 - looks more like powerbank issue
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1424 - no response from the reporter :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1484 - more like Pinecil hardware discussion than IronOS issue
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1508 - looks like another charger problems unfortunately :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1580 - hardware is not compatible for IronOS support
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1595 - as the author of STM32 Soldering Station Firmware project said: "I can't see any possible cooperation because the targetted devices are completely different".
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1643 - not an issue & no response from the reporter :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1644 - not IronOS scope, power source issue :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1668 - power source/cable issue :(
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/1162 - power source/cable issue :(
to verify by extra pair of eyes before closing but very suitable candidates:
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/303 - calibration functions have been implemented and they are ok
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/753 - as far as I understand, it's implemented to a certain degree on hardware where it's technically possible
https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/issues/757 - needs update but according the the most recent comment it's tips' issue not IronOS
Consider this as the first brief run through opened issues - if/once these will be closed, I will double-sweep the rest of opened ones. The idea is to close this issue once at least the ones from the list above will be closed.
However, if this suggestion (just by a person from the side) is wrong in any way and it's too much (i.e. telling the crew ~what to do~ to close other issues) then just let me know and I will close this issue in no time myself and won't bother you with that. But if you agree that some old issues should be cleaned up, then here there the list and you would have to dedicate just ~15-20 minutes of your time to click, scroll through (to check after me whether I'm right or wrong) & close them.
As always, can't wait to hear what do you think.