search

RandallFlagg / morelinq

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morelinq
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Review: MoreEnumerable.Rank() and MoreEnumerable.RankBy() #55

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Purpose of code changes on this branch:

Rev 149: Implementation of Rank returns a sequences of positive numbers
representing the rank of items in the source sequence, with the lowest
values corresponding to the "highest" value in the sequence. RankBy works
similarly by allows ranking to be based on a key determined by a caller
supplied function. Overload also exist that accept an IComparer<T> allowing
the comparison semantics to be defined by the caller.

When reviewing my code changes, please focus on:

* The public interface of the extension method.
* The effectiveness and clarity of the available XML comment documentation.
* How well this operator fits into the MoreLINQ ecosystem of
extension methods.
* The extent of coverage available from the corresponding unit tests.
* Whether edge cases are correctly identified and handled in the
implementation and tests.

After the review, I'll merge this branch into:
/trunk

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ambientl...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 12:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Now migrated to Hg and available in clone:
http://code.google.com/r/azizatif-morelinq-evenmore/
This clone is ready to be cloned :O) for further review. It also has the 
main/default branch already merged in to bring it up to date.

Original comment by azizatif on 25 May 2012 at 11:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by azizatif on 10 Jun 2012 at 3:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Following no response from ambientlion (who possibly/assuming lost interest 
given it has taken years to get this far), taking ownership of issue to 
consider as addition for MoreLINQ 2.0 milestone.

Original comment by azizatif on 12 Jun 2013 at 10:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision ecbb044b3f86.

Original comment by azizatif on 14 Jun 2013 at 5:18