While MumbleWrapper makes sense from the internal point of view, now that the name is exposed to the users through documentation, etc. I think we should rename it to MumbleClient as wrapper might end up confusing the users?
This shouldn't affect the interfaces in any way so it's not as big of a change as it sounds like.
While
MumbleWrapper
makes sense from the internal point of view, now that the name is exposed to the users through documentation, etc. I think we should rename it toMumbleClient
as wrapper might end up confusing the users?This shouldn't affect the interfaces in any way so it's not as big of a change as it sounds like.
Thoughts?