search

Rappsilber-Laboratory / xiSPEC_website

http://www.spectrumviewer.org
Apache License 2.0
3 stars 1 forks source link

Labelling parent ion m/z #40

Closed PhilipJBrownridge closed 5 years ago

PhilipJBrownridge commented 5 years ago

Hello, please would it be possible to label the any residual precursor on the spectrum? Also neutral loss from precursor? thanks Philip

lars-kolbowski commented 5 years ago

Hi Philip, any remaining precursor should be annotated in the spectrum if you select 'peptide' ion for annotation. So it should be done by default ("peptide, b, y" is the default setting). Neutral losses also should get annotated of all selected ions. You can see check the neutral loss settings in the Spectrum Settings at the bottom below the modifications.

PhilipJBrownridge commented 5 years ago

That's awesome! Sorry to be slow but does neutral loss also cover neutral loss from precursor? Thanks Philip

Philip J Brownridge

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:49 AM +0000, "lars-kolbowski" notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi Philip, any remaining precursor should be annotated in the spectrum if you select 'peptide' ion for annotation. So it should be done by default ("peptide, b, y" is the default setting). Neutral losses also should get annotated of all selected ions. You can see check the neutral loss settings in the Spectrum Settings at the bottom below the modifications.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Rappsilber-Laboratory/xiSPEC_website/issues/40#issuecomment-458456529, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/As73uRrrA47ZdP-5Qbe3p9VUhnZnx7l7ks5vIAsSgaJpZM4aWbuG.

lars-kolbowski commented 5 years ago

Yes it should since 'peptide ions' should be treated the same as other ions in terms of losses