Closed kraileth closed 6 years ago
Is there an upcoming port that would use that that would bump the minimum ravenadm requirement? I can add it now, but since no specification file uses it, it won't affect the minim ravenadm version.
No, not currently; you could just add it. I have some things using SDL that I want to add in the long run, but I did that audio stuff primarily because I got stuck on more important ports and wanted to escape from frustrating work for a moment. I'm back to the more serious stuff now.
no need to add it. ravenadm has supported this (in anticipation) for months:
https://github.com/jrmarino/ravenadm/blob/master/src/port_specification-transform.adb#L2792
Ah, that's of course fine, too! Closing...
Now that the packages for both SDL 1's and SDL 2's mixers are available, SDL_COMPONENTS could be modified to accept "mixer1" and "mixer2".