search

Raymond0212 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Behavior different from userguide #3

Open Raymond0212 opened 3 years ago

Raymond0212 commented 3 years ago

This constraint is not stated in user guide. image.png

nus-se-bot commented 3 years ago

Team's Response

This is a documentation bug instead of a functionality one as the constraint was not stated in the UG but is a reasonable and the intended behaviour. The purpose of the worker-avail command is for the user to view all workers who are able to take on a particular role in a particular shift. Therefore, when the specified shift no longer requires a worker to fill the specified role, it is reasonable that the message as shown above is displayed.

The severity has also been dropped to low as the displayed message is clear in explaining why a list of available workers (the usual behaviour) is not shown. Hence, although the same message is not explicitly stated in the UG, it is very unlikely that the user will be confused or any inconvenience will be caused as a result.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low] Originally [severity.Medium]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]