Potential reviewers - Githubissues

rougier commented 7 years ago

@rougier, @khinsen, @otizonaizit, @pdebuyl, @ctb, @ThomasA, @tpoisot, @benoit-girard, @karthik, @oliviaguest, @labarba, @benoit-girard, @MehdiKhamassi, @vitay, @gdetor, @dmcglinn, @yoavram, @FedericoV, @heplesser, @apdavison, @neuronalX, @piero-le-fou, @mstimberg, @rossant, @eroesch, @damiendr, @delsuc, @soolijoo, @benureau, @rth, @KamilSJaron, @almarklein, @pietromarchesi, @anyaevostinar, @ozancaglayan, @aaronshifman, @gviejo, @gdetor, @MehdiKhamassi, @benoit-girard, @opetchey, @Vahidrostami, @jsta, @Fjanks, @ChristophMetzner, @vitay, @akdiem, @falex33, @aaronshifman, @RafaelNH

Whatever the journal we choose, we'll certainly have to propose several names for the review. Given the high number of authors (50), we might have a lot of conflict of interests. Please propose name below (one per post) and if anybody has a conflict of interest, just add a thumb down.