Reproducibility of 'Poincaré dodecahedral space parameter estimates'

[broukema]

Original article: Roukema, B. F., Z. Buliński, and N. E. Gaudin, 2008, Poincaré dodecahedral space parameter estimates, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 492, 657 arXiv:0807.4260, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...492..657R

PDF URL: https://codeberg.org/boud/RBG08/raw/branch/master/Roukema_ReSciC2020.pdf Metadata URL: https://codeberg.org/boud/RBG08/src/branch/master/metadata.yaml Code URL: https://codeberg.org/boud/0807.4260 (and swh)

Scientific domain: Astronomy (Cosmology) Programming language: C + Fortran 77 Suggested editor: Based on fortran + C + scientific field per the official profiles, @pdebuyl would seem to be the most appropriate

This is Paper number 12 at https://github.com/ReScience/ten-years/issues/1.

[rougier]

Ok, thanks for the explanation. Let's wait and see.

[broukema]

@rougier @pdebuyl @oliviaguest The good news: this article (zenodo.3956058 = ReScience C 6, 1 (2020) #11) is accepted in ArXiv: it's https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07380 . The bad news: we don't get any explanation for the three week delay, and can only speculate on a mix of northern temperate zone holidays, the pandemic, and the innovative nature of ReScience C that presumably required discussion on what categories to choose for the article. The moderators for the proposed categories presumably had to negotiate and see if moderators from other categories would accept the article.

As a guideline for future ReScience C ArXiv submissions, the info we have in this case is:

• I submitted the article with
  • https://arxiv.org/list/cs.DL/recent as the primary classification and
  • https://arXiv.org/list/astro-ph.CO/recent as a secondary classification;
• the moderators presumably disagreed with both of these, and put my article in
  • https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CY/recent - Computers and Society - as the primary classification and
  • https://arxiv.org/list/cs.SE/recent - Software Engineering - as a secondary classification.

I see that I did suggest both cs.CY and cs.SE as possible classifications at https://github.com/ReScience/ten-years/issues/2 . So others intending to ArXiv their papers should probably try cs.CY and cs.SE directly, and that way avoid a delay during which moderators reclassify their article.

[khinsen]

@pdebuyl Since this paper is now published, can we close this issue?

[pdebuyl]

Yes we can :-) Thanks @broukema for the feedback on the arxiv deposition!

[broukema]

@pdebuyl And thanks for being on the ReScience C team! ;)