ReScience / submissions

ReScience C submissions
28 stars 7 forks source link

[Re] Predictive model for the size of bubbles and droplets created in microfluidic T-junctions #71

Open schackartk opened 1 year ago

schackartk commented 1 year ago

Original article: van Steijn V., Kleijn C.R., Kreutzer M.T., Predictive model for the size of bubbles and droplets created in microfluidic T-junctions. Lab Chip, 2010,10, 2513-2518

Full text PDF available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45114766_Predictive_model_for_the_size_of_bubbles_and_droplets_created_in_microfluidic_T-junctions

PDF URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/blob/master/article/article.pdf Metadata URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/blob/master/article/metadata.yaml Code URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/tree/master

Scientific domain: Microfluidics, mathematical modeling Programming language: Python Suggested editor: Lorena Barba Suggested reviewers: Vamsi Spandan and Kyle Niemeyer

schackartk commented 1 year ago

Tagging coauthor, @kkaarj.

rougier commented 1 year ago

Thanks your for your submission and very sorry for the delay, I did not see it initially. We'll assign an editor soon.

rougier commented 1 year ago

@labarba Could you edit this submission, two reviewers have been proposed and I can handle publication afterwards.

labarba commented 1 year ago

hi @rougier – I'm juggling a fairly heavy workload of service right now. I can be handling editor if the author is willing to be patient...

schackartk commented 1 year ago

Hi @labarba, thank you for your willingness to be the editor for our manuscript. We are not pressed for time and can be patient, but we don't wish to overburden you. So, @rougier, if you have any other potential editors in mind we would be open to that as well. Whatever you see fit will work for us!

rougier commented 1 year ago

@labarba Thansk for quick answer, I'll try to find another editor and come back to you if unlucky. @schackartk I'll try to invite other editors.

rougier commented 1 year ago

@ThomasA Could you handle this submission? I know it's not directly your domain but Lorena is quite busy right now.

schackartk commented 1 year ago

Hi @rougier I just wanted to check in and see if we may want to try requesting another editor?

rougier commented 1 year ago

Sorry for delay and thanks for the reminder.

@ReScience/editors Dear editor, we would need someone to edit this submission that might be a bit out of your domain but we'll find reviewers. @schackartk Could you suggest some reviewers (from the board of from outside)?

rougier commented 1 year ago

@schackartk Don't hesitate to remind me.

khinsen commented 1 year ago

@rougier This is close enough to my (former) field of work that I can handle this as an editor, but I wouldn't be able to propose suitable reviewers any more, as the people I might come up with are probably retired by now.

rougier commented 1 year ago

Thankss. We can work together with @schackartk to find reviewers. Also, @labarba might be able to suggest some reviewers.

schackartk commented 1 year ago

I would suggest the following potential reviewers,

From the board:

Outside:

In the spirit of transparency, the suggested outside reviewers are former colleagues of the authors.

khinsen commented 1 year ago

Thanks @schackartk for the suggestions!

khinsen commented 1 year ago

@nadnaps @kyleniemeyer @tarankalra1 Would any of you like to review this submission?