Open appukuttan-shailesh opened 3 years ago
Wow - I didn't know we have a Wikipedia page!
The original plan was to organize a conference in June 2020 to discuss the challenge and draw conclusions. For well-known reasons, this didn't happen. Many submissions and reviews were delayed as well. I must admit that I neglected the challenge as well over the last months, due to Covid-related overload.
As you can see here, there were 28 submissions in total, out of which ten are still in review. We ought to get these reviews finished before doing a final summary.
Sure, thats fine. I guess we should have the final numbers in a couple of months or so.
We're a bit late actually...
Out of curiosity, are there any plans to re-run the challenge this year?
Speaking only for myself: I think we should not plan a second round before having reviewed all the submissions of the first one, and drawn some conclusions. One conclusion might be to turn this into a permanent feature, rather than an occasional challenge.
Do we have any update on this? Are the final numbers now available?
I see here that we still have 5 submissions under review. Two of them seem to be actively worked upon (updates in the last 2-3 months), but not the other three.
I think we can consider the challenge over even if some review are still pending. I second he suggestion of @khinsen of having a new entry of type self-replication with the same conditions (10 years). What do you think @oliviaguest @benoit-girard ?
I was wondering if an updated summary of the 10 year challenge was posted anywhere?
The only related info I could find was:
(based on https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02462-7 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReScience_C)
I see here that eventually the publication count rose from 13 to 18.
(hoping to avoid having to manually go through each of them to find the latest stats.