Closed Flakebi closed 4 years ago
@Flakebi me is totally OK.
As a side note: what do you think about BlueOak-1.0.0 license?
Yes, I agree to re-licensing my code under MIT/Apache 2.0.
Thanks a lot, done in 5e4eb23.
As a side note: what do you think about BlueOak-1.0.0 license?
Sounds interesting, I didn’t hear of that before, so thanks for the note. This article of the author sounds really great, it’s an utopia unfortunately: https://writing.kemitchell.com/2019/03/17/License-Utopia.html I think the MIT/Apache combination is still a nice fit for Rust libraries because a great part of Rust libraries out there are using these.
Hi, I think it might be a good idea to license these crates under the MIT/Apache 2.0 licenses, as these are widely used throughout the Rust library ecosystem. To do so, I need your agreement to use/relicense your contributions under MIT/Apache 2.0, as you contributed to this project under OSL.
Are you ok with this change?