search

ReaCoMa / ReaCoMa-2.0

ReaCoMa 2.0
GNU General Public License v3.0
36 stars 2 forks source link

Congrats and Reapack question #8

Closed AlbertoV5 closed 1 year ago

AlbertoV5 commented 2 years ago

Just tried Reacoma in a few samples and it's just what I needed. Had this type of functionality on the back of my mind since using librosa a few years ago and this looks like a clean and powerful algorithm+implementation. Congratulations and thank you! (I'll donate as soon as I can).

Now my question is if the Reapack version is maintained or updated frequently as it is a nice way to manage Reaper extension for me, or should I just go with the main branch instead?

Thanks.

jamesb93 commented 2 years ago

Hey!

Thanks for the kind words.

The ReaPack branch was me experimenting with how I would need to restructure the code in order to make it "compliant" with the structure that ReaPack expects. I aim to do this at some point but it is a commitment to a structure which I'm not decided on how happy I am yet.

Out of curiosity would ReaPack support be a big boon for someone like yourself?

AlbertoV5 commented 2 years ago

It's always nice to have and it may be easier to share with other Reaper users but for me works alright as it is right now.

jamesb93 commented 2 years ago

It's always nice to have and it may be easier to share with other Reaper users but for me works alright as it is right now.

Cool, good to know.