Closed nikoescobal closed 5 days ago
It is truly great work, but shouldn't stick with the same styling rules. I see we used tailwind for everything and just some css for a few things, so I think that maybe switching to css modules add an inconsistency. That is my only comment other than that great work!
Thank you @HusseinSerag! I actually added 4 different spinners - 2 align with the brand guidelines (or at least I tried to make sure they do π. Have you seen the others? Also, I did my best to recreate the 3d spinner effect with only Tailwind but it is not possible unfortunately (check the 4th one). I should remove the scss.module for the 4th one as it uses just Tailwind
Yes, I checked everything out. Also @tjtanjin will have the last say. I think just refactoring the scss.module to normal css would be fine as we are using tailwind and we dont need sass, but anyways good work!
Gotcha. I guess we'll just have to wait for what @tjtanjin has to say. And I'd argue the benefits of scss over CSS haha but I'm happy to adjust if this is what the team prefers. Thank you again for the kind words and feedback.
Hey @nikoescobal, as discussed, let's go with the third spinner. Trouble you to update the PR π
@tjtanjin PR is updated now - please check. I did notice though that we are still using slate-400 and slate-500. I think tailwindconfig needs cleaning up.
@tjtanjin better late than never lol - I added in the changes!
@nikoescobal thanks for your contribution, great work! Your pr is being added to the main branch.
Description
Closes #25
What change does this PR introduce?
Please select the relevant option(s).
What is the proposed approach?
Please give a short overview/explanation on the approach taken to resolve the issue(s).
Checklist: