Closed JacksonBurns closed 9 months ago
looks like this fixed the publish documentation issue! I saw that some of the check documentation links failed. Is that expected?
looks like this fixed the publish documentation issue!
Unfortunately we can't actually tell if the publish step works until merged into main, since it is skipped on PRs (thus the increasingly long line of PRs trying to fix the same thing).
I saw that some of the check documentation links failed. Is that expected?
Some yes, others no. It's a mix of private links that always fail, some which have actually broken that we need to fix, and some that are broken but are in deprecated parts of our docs. Another PR could look through them in the future, but no users have complained about the docs so we can safely ignore for the time being.
Thanks for the quick review!
⚠️ One or more regression tests failed. Please download the failed results and run the tests locally or check the log to see why.
beep boop this comment was written by a bot :robot:
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
88ebe24
) 55.14% compared to head (b2f0df4
) 55.14%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Still trying to fix the docs building action. This time, it seems like omitting
--global
from the git sign in has meant that, for some reason, it just didn't work. See: https://github.com/ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py/actions/runs/7873601921/job/21481327559#step:12:38