Open jackmeagher opened 7 years ago
Several open pull requests seem to not have noticed that the custom comparer function here is inverted, and hence the output listed (42, 42) is correct. Hopefully this quick comment change will make it clear that this is not a mistake.
Several open pull requests seem to not have noticed that the custom comparer function here is inverted, and hence the output listed (42, 42) is correct. Hopefully this quick comment change will make it clear that this is not a mistake.