Closed benlesh closed 3 years ago
I suggest lock conversation to internalize this for core team discussion.
This was brought before and we have opencollective account even. But at the moment the majority of members agreed we don't have explicit usage even if we get sponsor / funding, while it potentially makes harder for project management perspective. I still stand on this.
For me, suggested usecase 1/2 seems pretty thin and for those (or other arbitary purpose) I don't see good benefit to get external funding. Even more, I am bit in doubt if we could have amount of funds to use.
Slightly derailing topic, in my opinion OSS-approved non-funding support (i.e tooling have oss license / discount, some CI for OSS - we had saucelabs for this - ) are more valuable in terms of our team size or more some organizational help or vice versa. Not sure direct funding is something we want even - that's reason we discussed this back in the days and arrived 2.
At this time, the core team can't think of what we'd do with the money, or how much money would even be feasible to make off of such things. Closing for now. But is was worth discussion.
Since this has been "in the news" for tech twitter recently, I'd like to discuss this at the core team meeting.
What I'm okay with using this for:
What I'm not okay with using this for:
If we had a surplus, which is extraordinarily doubtful, I think we could give the remainder to charity or something.
Possible sources for this are basically just from donations. Which, I'm sure would be generally so small that maybe this is a non-issue.
Posting this as an issue, so I can make it an agenda item.