robdmoore
commented
6 years ago Yep - I wouldn’t remove it since they are a list of possible examples. If we make everything super generic they lose all specificity and they become less useful for people. For instance, is losing the list of examples (e.g. blogging etc.) in this PR an issue here (putting aside the fact I think that list could be improved), or is it obvious?
--
On 11 Apr 2018, at 6:37 am, Will Ray notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
@WillRay commented on this pull request.
@@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ Being technical does not eliminate the need to utilise soft skills, as you will I am a consultant, an architect, and a communicator and a problem solver. I am the go-to person in the general technology area. I represent the technical brilliance that Readify brings to the market.
I am known for my technical knowledge
-- I have community engagement. This may include but is not limited to speaking at conferences and user groups, writing books or blog posts, answering Stack Overflow or forum questions or being an MVP. -- I contribute to open source projects. +- I am sharing my on-the-job learning and experiences with others so they can be more effective in their roles. +- I am actively involved in helping guide others through tough technical challenges. +- I contribute to open source projects.
I like the idea of removing the OS line, but I'd be curious to hear what @robdmoorehttps://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Frobdmoore&data=02%7C01%7Crob.moore%40readify.net%7C7b24b3c98d714516b0c108d59f3395e1%7C413504eb862247d2aa72ddbba4584471%7C0%7C0%7C636589966267145133&sdata=mz%2FCfe60baepedbm0oDOzxUCqIQMd6KzOm6LUWnLdqE%3D&reserved=0 thinks about it.
One thing to keep in mind that the list are "examples" they aren't a definitive list of what to do. Some will apply to some people in a role and not others.
It might be fair to say that OS contribution is one way an SE can be reviewed against.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FReadify%2Fmadskillz%2Fpull%2F100%23discussion_r180587857&data=02%7C01%7Crob.moore%40readify.net%7C7b24b3c98d714516b0c108d59f3395e1%7C413504eb862247d2aa72ddbba4584471%7C0%7C0%7C636589966267145133&sdata=GJelNKGL2rK2kl82vqE72t6Kp%2BdVChklrr3vXLUvTPQ%3D&reserved=0, or mute the threadhttps://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAAjBX3FeUjjxNTVdsM6on_rgI8kwGImAks5tnTQOgaJpZM4S3220&data=02%7C01%7Crob.moore%40readify.net%7C7b24b3c98d714516b0c108d59f3395e1%7C413504eb862247d2aa72ddbba4584471%7C0%7C0%7C636589966267145133&sdata=N96%2FdcHhvvSxN9ENYNGG%2BhlIGVkMAYtOY20WijXpPaI%3D&reserved=0.
WillRay
This language change avoids the implication of SE's needing a "personal brand", and focuses more on the attributes we want them to demonstrate.
Addresses #73