The reason why I removed the comment(i.e. // TODO:) in copy-paste widget and add it in the instruction, I think it not only encourages attendees to read/understand the instruction first(b/c they need to know where this codes should be replaced/added) but also avoids to duplicate the comments in the code when the attendee copy the codes including comments then paste them in the Java file. For example, they return a newline after existing comment(i.e. // TODO: Construct a simple...) then paste the codes and comments from the instruction.
For #line 481, if you mean to use "-f /projects/dg8-workshop/dg8-exercises" in maven build, it's fine by me to rollback not to use and add the previous note at the begging of the exercise. The reason why I updated is that I was asked 3~4 SAs had the same issue that they skipped to change the path. So if this happened in SAs, customers(devs) could do the same mistake. How about restoring the notes(make sure to use the correct path) then use the -f option at the same time to avoid unnecessary mistakes?
The reason why I removed the comment(i.e. // TODO:) in copy-paste widget and add it in the instruction, I think it not only encourages attendees to read/understand the instruction first(b/c they need to know where this codes should be replaced/added) but also avoids to duplicate the comments in the code when the attendee copy the codes including comments then paste them in the Java file. For example, they return a newline after existing comment(i.e. // TODO: Construct a simple...) then paste the codes and comments from the instruction.
For #line 481, if you mean to use "-f /projects/dg8-workshop/dg8-exercises" in maven build, it's fine by me to rollback not to use and add the previous note at the begging of the exercise. The reason why I updated is that I was asked 3~4 SAs had the same issue that they skipped to change the path. So if this happened in SAs, customers(devs) could do the same mistake. How about restoring the notes(make sure to use the correct path) then use the
-f
option at the same time to avoid unnecessary mistakes?