Open dcaryll opened 9 months ago
@dcaryll Just so you're aware, here are some concepts that are being explored and reviewed.
https://www.figma.com/proto/JbdmuSkfh0CuzqUZixb1UY?node-id=1-5&locale=en
These are great explorations! Thanks for sharing.
I think it's important to note how labels and chips can be distinguished from one another.
Dan Caryll Senior Manager, UX Design and Development Red Hat - NC 100 E Davie Street
@.***
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 3:37 PM coreyvickery @.***> wrote:
@dcaryll https://github.com/dcaryll Just so you're aware, here are some concepts that are being explored and reviewed.
https://www.figma.com/proto/JbdmuSkfh0CuzqUZixb1UY?node-id=1-5&locale=en
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/RedHat-UX/red-hat-design-system/issues/1456#issuecomment-1955039172, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJRDU522GMEYOAPXG7W7GDYUUCQZAVCNFSM6AAAAABCFV55BKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJVGAZTSMJXGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@markcaron @hellogreg I would like to get this done in Charmander
.
pf-chip composes into pf-text-input for things like search. will rh-chip do the same? would that change it's semantics or usability? cc @adamjohnson
pf-chip composes into pf-text-input for things like search. will rh-chip do the same?
Was the <pf-text-input>
+ <pf-chip>
composition use case discussed elsewhere with regards to accessibility?
This is a common pattern seen on the web. Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, the APG Patterns don't have guidance for an input containing multiple selected items (correct me if I am wrong). Select2 is a classic library that does this but has had accessibility issues over the years.
IMO, we should steer users away from this UI pattern until the accessibility story becomes more solidified.
@adamjohnson I think pf-chip is being deprecated in PatternFly 6. I am checking with the team about this.
[DEPRECATED FILE] is a comprehensive file of what I have been working on for rh-chip
. I just need a few folks from other design teams to approve first before you get started.
Edit: This no longer applies, see comment below.
There are some explorations of smaller chips for inputs on the last page.
@adamjohnson According to the PatternFly team, pf-chip
is being replaced by pf-label
.
If rh-chip
needs to be used in inputs like search, maybe we can use rh-tag
instead or add to rh-tag
if needed, like a more compact version.
@coreyvickery Just FYI had a short conversation with @eyevana about compact
on rh-tag
today, maybe get her use case for that as well?
Update 5/22: Design leads will give feedback on this component on Tuesday, May 28. Marionne will present as Corey will be out.
@markcaron Do we need anyone else to approve of the current design or can we proceed with development?
@coreyvickery if design is good with it, then I'm good with it.
Description
RHDS needs the have the ability to filter pieces of content using "chips". This is typically a single taxonomy way of filtering versus the multiple ways of filtering that a taxonomy box offers.
https://www.patternfly.org/components/chip/
Example in production on cloud.redhat.com/learn
Acceptance Criteria
Image
No response
Link to design doc
No response
Other resources
No response