fix: do not obfuscate in runtime but in archive only

[xiangce]

• For 'persist' specs, they might be used during collection, to avoid failure collection of dependencies, they shouldn't be obfuscated in runtime. But they should be obfuscated when writing to archive. See the tests
• Jira: RHINENG-13591

All Pull Requests:

Check all that apply:

• [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document, including the instructions about commit messages?
• [x] No Sensitive Data in this change?
• [x] Is this PR to correct an issue?
• [ ] Is this PR an enhancement?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 77.02%. Comparing base (416ed6b) to head (54d0594).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #4249 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 77.01% 77.02% +0.01% ========================================== Files 761 761 Lines 41471 41472 +1 Branches 8763 8763 ========================================== + Hits 31937 31943 +6 + Misses 8481 8479 -2 + Partials 1053 1050 -3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RedHatInsights/insights-core/pull/4249/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RedHatInsights) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/RedHatInsights/insights-core/pull/4249/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RedHatInsights) | `77.00% <100.00%> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=RedHatInsights#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.