Closed cangiuli closed 6 years ago
@favonia @ecavallo So, @jonsterling and I wrote a bunch of really gnarly proofs but we're still stuck and somehow I suspect there's an easier way to do all of this. Does someone want to take a look at how to prove the direct version of nat->list/is-equiv'
?
Although it's not fully perfected, I think it might be time to merge this stuff.
With lots of help from @jonsterling and @ecavallo.