Closed dengliming closed 4 years ago
hi there @dengliming , I believe that we should avoid at all cost to include breaking changes on the methods signatures. IMHO we should not break backwards compatibility and potentially break user's code with this addition. If we think that not passing the index name is a must then we should include additional methods. what do you think?
@filipecosta90 You're absolutely right, I'm sorry I didn't notice these methods was already in release version. And I think not passing the index name would be better.
hi there @dengliming, closing this one since as per our discussion above I believe we agree in not breaking the client
Codecov Report
79.66% <100.00%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.