Exactly what it says on the tin. Also, comment and cleanup (I had left some functions literally marked "does nothing" because I couldn't tell what they output--even though I knew commenting them out broke the code--so now that I've figured it out, I've gone back and clarified).
Issue(s)
Meant to facilitate using human-readable item IDs when we switch to JSON level serialization.
Future work
items.xml.tres still uses ints for its IDs. The ints are stored as strings, so it still works, but it's far from human-readable yet.
Description of changes
Exactly what it says on the tin. Also, comment and cleanup (I had left some functions literally marked "does nothing" because I couldn't tell what they output--even though I knew commenting them out broke the code--so now that I've figured it out, I've gone back and clarified).
Issue(s)
Meant to facilitate using human-readable item IDs when we switch to JSON level serialization.
Future work
items.xml.tresstill uses ints for its IDs. The ints are stored as strings, so it still works, but it's far from human-readable yet.