Results on DIV2K validation set

[liyuantsao]

Dear authors, I have some questions about the results on DIV2K validation set (Table 4):

1. Did you use resized HR images to generate LR-HR pairs with predefined LR/HR resolutions, rather than the original DIV2K validation set? Could this potentially lead to biased evaluation results by omitting finer details from the original HR images?

2. How about the LPIPS scores, since all papers in Table 4 are generative SR methods.

3. Can your model produce full-resolution images on the DIV2K validation set without cropping them into squared dimensions? I'm curious because other works in the field seem to adopt this validation setting.

4. If not, could you share your specific validation setting, including LR resolution, HR resolution, and any pertinent details?

Thank you! If I made some mistakes, please correct me.

[prokaryote-hgy]

Dear authors, I have some questions about the results on DIV2K validation set (Table 4):

1. Did you use resized HR images to generate LR-HR pairs with predefined LR/HR resolutions, rather than the original DIV2K validation set? Could this potentially lead to biased evaluation results by omitting finer details from the original HR images?
2. How about the LPIPS scores, since all papers in Table 4 are generative SR methods.
3. Can your model produce full-resolution images on the DIV2K validation set without cropping them into squared dimensions? I'm curious because other works in the field seem to adopt this validation setting.
4. If not, could you share your specific validation setting, including LR resolution, HR resolution, and any pertinent details?

Thank you! If I made some mistakes, please correct me.

Same question, have you solved this?