Closed JayBazuzi closed 3 years ago
That could work. Maybe some rule about the max risk of all the sub-commits?
R r r r -> R R R B -> B
I agree on the max risk, but would say that the letter choice should match the intent. Eg
r r R r t B!! t r r F r R r -> F!! (was intending F, did a B along the way, max risk was !!)
I added M as an extended intention when I re-wrote this in terms of risk levels and intentions. Does that meet the needs of this PR, and if so can we close it?
Yes.
I've been encouraging use of the
F
orB
family for these. That way the commits along the main branch all state the overall features / bugs / progress items that people made, so readers can ignore the side branch unless they want detail. This also gives people a good place to put the overall summary info & the various tracking tags (like Jira ticket numbers, common spec notices, etc - all the things that tie into automation).Thoughts?