[TEST] run tests in random order

[Remi-Gau]

run test in random order to potentially detect test pollution

[github-actions[bot]]

👋 @Remi-Gau Thanks for creating a PR!

Until this PR is ready for review, you can include the [WIP] tag in its title, or leave it as a github draft.

Please make sure it is compliant with our contributing guidelines. In particular, be sure it checks the boxes listed below.

• [ ] PR has an interpretable title.
• [ ] PR links to Github issue with mention Closes #XXXX (see our documentation on PR structure)
• [ ] Code is PEP8-compliant (see our documentation on coding style)
• [ ] Changelog or what's new entry in doc/changes/latest.rst (see our documentation on PR structure)

For new features:

• [ ] There is at least one unit test per new function / class (see our documentation on testing)
• [ ] The new feature is demoed in at least one relevant example.

For bug fixes:

• [ ] There is at least one test that would fail under the original bug conditions.

We will review it as quick as possible, feel free to ping us with questions if needed.

[sourcery-ai[bot]]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.47 ⭐	1.47 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	56.17 ⭐	56.17 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	7.35 🙂	7.35 🙂	0.00
Quality	75.28% ⭐	75.28% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	115	116	1

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
setup.py	66.82% 🙂	66.82% 🙂	0.00%
maint_tools/show-python-packages-versions.py	85.99% ⭐	85.99% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #24 (ceae4d0) into main (0b3de6e) will decrease coverage by 0.10%. The diff coverage is 91.79%.

:exclamation: Current head ceae4d0 differs from pull request most recent head 572d1e9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 572d1e9 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #24      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.43%   91.34%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         133      133              
  Lines       15470    15470              
  Branches     3207     3207              
==========================================
- Hits        14145    14131      -14     
- Misses        780      793      +13     
- Partials      545      546       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
nilearn/datasets/func.py	78.05% <ø> (-0.26%)	:arrow_down:
nilearn/datasets/struct.py	90.75% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/decoding/space_net_solvers.py	98.05% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/decomposition/_base.py	94.87% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/decomposition/canica.py	91.66% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/image/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/image/image.py	95.65% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/image/resampling.py	93.58% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/input_data/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
nilearn/input_data/base_masker.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 37 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.