Closed liz-fw closed 1 week ago
note: it may be much simpler to use this workflow instead of the tmh workflow (as you suggested!):
this includes Tuolumne
, Feather
, Sacramento
, and floodplain (Sutter Bypass
and Lower-mid Sacramento
, Liz to follow up on how to divvy this up)
done
The HRL scenario for R2R requires flow-area curves that include HRL habitat commitments.
As of July 17, 2024 only the Yuba and American have provided these.
For all other watersheds where we don't have those data, we need to create synthetic flow-area curves that approximate the HRL habitat commitments as best as we can.
Our proposed method is to scale up the existing flow-area curves using a "scaling factor" based on the watershed commitments listed in Appendix 2 of the Memorandum of Understanding, p.57.
I created a folder https://github.com/Reorienting-to-Recovery/DSMhabitat/tree/hrl-curves/data-raw/R2R_HRL_habitat_inputs which has three draft scripts based on a workflow i took from the TMH work. Feel free to keep or remove any of these scripts for simplicity, except this script https://github.com/Reorienting-to-Recovery/DSMhabitat/blob/hrl-curves/data-raw/R2R_HRL_habitat_inputs/hrl_data_formatting.R, which reads in a
.csv
format of the MOU and can be used to develop the "scaling factors" for the HRL curves.hrl-curves
data-raw/R2R_HRL_habitat_inputs/
folder, generate "scaled" versions of the curves for all watersheds represented in the MOUPlease let me know if anything here doesn't make sense or if you have clarifying questions.
I will make sure to ask about: