Closed ncollier closed 1 year ago
From a user:
I notice that with v. 1.1.0, if the first "at" of the schedule is 0 it is skipped and the execution starts with the next one. Also the same actions at intervals +1 do not operate. With the previous version, this was not happening.
Fixed in 67a456d
ncollier
commented
1 year ago
From a user:
I notice that with v. 1.1.0, if the first "at" of the schedule is 0 it is skipped and the execution starts with the next one. Also the same actions at intervals +1 do not operate. With the previous version, this was not happening.