Replicable-MARL / MARLlib

One repository is all that is necessary for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL)
https://marllib.readthedocs.io
MIT License
945 stars 153 forks source link

Doing Counterfactual Experience Replay #222

Open nikhil-pitta opened 9 months ago

nikhil-pitta commented 9 months ago

I would like to try and do some counterfactual experience replay (specifically I want to use PPO and do CER on the critic). Is there something that exposes the replay buffer or something that allows me to add custom trajectories while training somehow?

Also, how do I access the trajectories taken by the model during training?

Aequatio-Space commented 9 months ago

You can try overriding the postprocess_fn in PPOTOrchPolicy. In the MARLlib, such an example may be: https://github.com/Replicable-MARL/MARLlib/blob/368c6173577d0f9c0ad70fb5b4b6afa12c864c15/marllib/marl/algos/core/CC/coma.py#L116-L125

the signature for postprocess_fn is fixed, which is

postprocess_fn(
policy: Policy, sample_batch: SampleBatch, 
other_agent_batches: Optional[Dict[AgentID, SampleBatch]] = None, 
episode: Optional[MultiAgentEpisode] = None
) -> SampleBatch

As displayed in the build_policy_class in https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/55fc0710d8472a9abaf244ed6567eb3b13136531/rllib/policy/policy_template.py#L40-L43

You can manipulate the SampleBatch instance provided in the signature to add custom trajectories.

nikhil-pitta commented 9 months ago

@Aequatio-Space Is this function called before or after both the policy gradient and value function gradient update in ippo or in between?

Aequatio-Space commented 9 months ago

@nikhil-pitta it is called before both the policy gradient and value function gradient. The pipeline is basically: extra_action_out_fn → postprocess_fn → loss_fn → compute_gradients → apply_gradients.

nikhil-pitta commented 8 months ago

@Aequatio-Space Thanks so much for the info! We would like to add counterfactual experience to DDPG before adding to the replay buffer or when pulling from the replay buffer to evaluate. Specifically, we want to augment our current step/collected experiences and add to the replay buffer for the algorithm to use. What callback function could we do to use this, and would it be the same for every offline policy? If not a callback, what would you suggest we do?

Aequatio-Space commented 8 months ago

@nikhil-pitta You mentioned "augment our current step/collected experiences and add to the replay buffer", and it sounds exactly what postprocess_fn do, as our earlier discussion. This extra function applies to all MARLlib algorithms since the interface is identical.

nikhil-pitta commented 8 months ago

@Aequatio-Space Thank you for the response, and yes that function is exactly what I need! I tried using it for PPO by overriding the postprocess_fn for the IPPOTorchPolicy (https://github.com/Replicable-MARL/MARLlib/blob/master/marllib/marl/algos/core/IL/ppo.py; line 31).

I wanted to do the same thing for IQL, and saw this file https://github.com/Replicable-MARL/MARLlib/blob/master/marllib/marl/algos/core/VD/iql_vdn_qmix.py, but I was unsure how to add a postprocess_fn or any other callback because it looks like a new policy is written up within this file that doesn't accept callback functions like the PPOTorchPolicy.

Do you know what I can do to add callback functionality for IQL?

Aequatio-Space commented 8 months ago

@nikhil-pitta Note that JointQPolicy inherits the Policy class, which has a function postprocess_trajectory. https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/55fc0710d8472a9abaf244ed6567eb3b13136531/rllib/policy/policy.py#L361-L366. Directly overriding this function may help.

nikhil-pitta commented 7 months ago

@Aequatio-Space Thanks for the response again! So now I am trying use IQL, but an issue I'm facing is that I want each of my agents to have separate policies, but I run into the exception ValueError("joint Q learning does not support individual function"), which comes from setting share_policy="individual."

This is not my desired behavior because I would like each agent to have their own policies, which is how I expected IQL to be implemented. Is there any way to get around this?

Aequatio-Space commented 7 months ago

I remember joint Q learning supports share_policy=all, you can see the related logic at here. https://github.com/Replicable-MARL/MARLlib/blob/368c6173577d0f9c0ad70fb5b4b6afa12c864c15/marllib/marl/algos/run_vd.py#L105-L118 Try to adapt the code under this setting.