ATM _run+ would increment throughout all sequences, ie. for _acq-1_run+, _acq-2_run+, _acq-1_run+, _acq-2_run+ we would get _acq-1_run-1, _acq-2_run-2, _acq-1_run-3, _acq-2_run-4, whenever what we really want is _acq-1_run-1, _acq-2_run-1, _acq-1_run-2, _acq-2_run-2. So we should either fix "unconditionally" to do it within the name otherwise, or do it via some additional _run+?.
In general we advise against using such auto-increments since then becomes impossible to account for canceled runs.
ATM
_run+would increment throughout all sequences, ie. for_acq-1_run+,_acq-2_run+,_acq-1_run+,_acq-2_run+we would get_acq-1_run-1,_acq-2_run-2,_acq-1_run-3,_acq-2_run-4, whenever what we really want is_acq-1_run-1,_acq-2_run-1,_acq-1_run-2,_acq-2_run-2. So we should either fix "unconditionally" to do it within the name otherwise, or do it via some additional_run+?.In general we advise against using such auto-increments since then becomes impossible to account for canceled runs.