search

ReproducibleQM / NES

The National Eutrophication Survey: lake characteristics and historical nutrient concentrations
https://doi.org/10.5063/F1CZ35HF
Mozilla Public License 2.0
4 stars 4 forks source link

Add "Author Contribution" in draft article #22

Closed mill2735 closed 7 years ago

mill2735 commented 7 years ago

Each of us needs to write something for this, so I'm assigning this to all those who currently have nothing in this section of the draft article

jsta commented 7 years ago

Do we want to write one sentence per person or one sentence per task? How general should we be on this? My preference would be to keep it general and write one sentence per task with the following tasks:

I am new to this so I don't know what the norms are. What do other people think?

kingka21 commented 7 years ago

I think we should be very general and just have one sentence per task (I read a paper yesterday that was general and I liked it). 

Something like:

"All authors contributed to data quality assurance and edited the article text. JS conceived the study and implemented the optical character recognition code. CF, DK, and RN performed the data analysis and made figures. KK, HM, and JS wrote major parts of the manuscript text."

Quoting Joseph Stachelek notifications@github.com:

Do we want to write one sentence per person or one sentence per task? How general should we be on this? My preference would be to keep it general and write one sentence per task with the following tasks:

  writing   data analysis   data QA   data collection

I am new to this so I don't know what the norms are. What do other people think?

-- You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ReproducibleQM/NES/issues/22#issuecomment-298268235

jsta commented 7 years ago

Sounds great. I went ahead and replaced the old text with what you have here.