Open yattias opened 1 month ago
One drawback we've been bumping into (maybe 5ish% of the time) is users who have left universities/institutions and no longer have "institution" emails. It would be good to have a flow to vet these (i.e. having official transcripts sent in lieu of an email or even non-institution emails in a viable way)
That's good know @jeffreykoury
@TylerDiorio Could we connect with Persona and see if they can help with that? Maybe we can skip validating institution email.
Re: Persona I created a Sandbox account with Persona to test out some of the functionality - from their Docs I see that you can do a "Document verification" which could probably be used to verify transcripts (i.e. dated University affiliation). Another question might be, is this something we need to have - since it does introduce quite a bit of friction + effort on the part of the researcher. If it's a past institution they may have to request their transcripts which can take time (and maybe money?)
The UX around KYC is a bit unclear and need to be ironed out. We may not deliver the ideal UX in the initial release, but would be good to identify what this ideal UX looks like so we can plan for it.
Some thoughts:
KYC (identity) is different than rewards claim on a paper and should probably not be tightly coupled with it
Good UX would not require user to exclusively be on a paper page in order to initiate a claim because this will be a "hidden action" which will be missed by many of our users.
Complexity arises around bootstrapping an author profile page after KYC process. In order to bootstrap a profile we need to know either a DOI or some other identifying piece of data. If process is initiated outside of a paper page we do not have this information
If user has already KYC'd then they do not need to do so again when claiming a paper, only the first time Need to figure out
Initiating claim via paper page
Initiating claim elsewhere (such as left sidebar) Same as above but will require user to enter a DOI
KYC (identity) is different than rewards claim on a paper and should probably not be tightly coupled with it
Agreed:
Good UX would not require user to exclusively be on a paper page in order to initiate a claim because this will be a "hidden action" which will be missed by many of our users. Complexity arises around bootstrapping an author profile page after KYC process. In order to bootstrap a profile we need to know either a DOI or some other identifying piece of data. If process is initiated outside of a paper page we do not have this information
My thought on possible flows, where the KYC modal has a DOI/Author field required:
Thanks @TylerDiorio. I was also thinking about the UX below
My thought on possible flows, where the KYC modal has a DOI/Author field required:
Initiating claim via paper page
- If not KYC'd, show KYC modal with auto-populated DOI/Author selection from paper page
- Once KYC'd, auto-populate a complete profile page
- Send in-app notification, prompting users "Congrats, you're verified" -> "Go to claim/collect your paper rewards", where we suggest their best paper as a starting suggestion
Initiating claim via side-bar
- If not KYC'd, show KYC modal with empty URL/DOI/Author field
- User pastes a URL/DOI, which finds the paper and creates a drop-down list of authors.
- User selects their name in the author list
- Once KYC'd, auto-populate a complete profile page
- Send in-app notification, prompting users "Congrats, you're verified" -> "Go to claim/collect your paper rewards", where we suggest their best paper as a starting suggestion
Some questions:
Is a DOI sufficient in all cases to populate an author profile page. I think so but can be missing something. From a DOI we can extract author, from author we get works and then create profile
It feels like it should be enough to create the author page like you mentioned (DOI -> Author -> Works). OpenAlex has a few useful things here:
"authorships": [{"author_position": "first", "author": {"id": "https://openalex.org/A5059317331", "display_name": "Wahyu Utami", "orcid": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-2577"}, "institutions": [], "countries": [], "country_ids": [], "is_corresponding": false, "raw_author_name": "Wahyu Utami", "raw_affiliation_strings": []}, {"author_position": "last", "author": {"id": "https://openalex.org/A5064566864", "display_name": "Apt. Sudibyo Martono", "orcid": null}, "institutions": [], "countries": [], "country_ids": [], "is_corresponding": false, "raw_author_name": "Apt Sudibyo Martono", "raw_affiliation_strings": []}]
{"id":"https://openalex.org/A5059317331","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-2577","display_name":"Wahyu Utami","display_name_alternatives":["Wida Utami","Winda Anggun Utami","Wahyu Pakerty Utami","W. Utami","Wahyu Lestari Utami","Wahyu Dwi Utami","Wahyu Utami","Wahyu Dhini Siswi Utami"]
Multiple Author objects associated with a given individual:
From a time perspective, including a DOI in the modal will make development slower because we are now mingling identity verification with DOI and may not be able to use the Persona modal out of the box. More research will need to be done here to assess feasibility.
I'm not sure I understand fully. It sounds like we could use Persona's out of the box modal to get their identity verified. Then after that, we can allow them to enter a DOI & select author for the purpose of fetching their Author & Works from OpenAlex. The interplay between Persona & DOI doesn't necessarily need to be automated in the v1 if we can't fit it in the scope. During Admin reviewal of claimed papers, the verified name and the author name being claimed can be inspected manually to begin
UX Suggestions:
Update author claiming functionality to be KYC based.
Rationale for feature: Authors will be able to earn rewards on their papers. In order to accurately provide rewards to the right people, a KYC process will need to be in place. Prior to the KYC approach, multiple iterations of a verification feature were attempted which resulted in abuse of our platform.
High level workflow:
Part 1: Identity
Part 2: Profile
Potential Initiation points