Closed ptsefton closed 1 year ago
We're doing this now - does anyone object to it being made legit in the spec?
I think it should be allowed. This is also useful for profiles #153 if we want to type as prof:Profile
which seems a useful type for profiles together with profile nesting prof:isProfileOf
As a profile designer I want to have additional types on the root dataset to simplify writing profiles - the current use case is wanting to be able to double up with "RepositoryCollection" (pcdmCollection) or "RepositoryObject" (pcdm:Object) to distinguish between collections and "actual data".