Closed BardiaHeidari closed 8 years ago
Addition of Urban Heat Island mitigation effects to the co-benefit assessment models is another possibility. Sammy has conducted UHI mitigation assessment using ANN for Gwens Fall watershed. Bardia and Sammy will talk about the possibility.
We decided to use spider plots as a platform to demonstrate difference in performance metric- i.e. environmental benefits, economic cost, and hydro logical performance. In other words, we want to allow users to see the effects of their designs. To do so, we need to keep a record of all workfows they have created and interactively compare them to each other.
To facilitate communication of results to the users, we are going to modify units of some of the reported benefits. Here are some of the modifications: 1- Stormwater capture: will be reported both in mm and mm/household and mm/ piece of GI 2- Air quality uptake: will be reported in Ib/year and Ib/year/piece of GI
Storage of output results from a scenario run is summarized in #59.
We are adding peak flow from IUHM of both scenarios for 2-yr, 5-yr,10-yr, and 100-yr return period storms to report. The duration of the storms selected are still under discussion. I would suggest some duration like 2-hr and 24-hr for the storms we are looking at.
Further discussion of which one of the peak flow (which frequency and duration) should be selected for the report.
We decided to add pictures/ maps of the watershed inside the report for a more informative visualization of the design scenarios.
We decided to provide more descriptions on the titles shown inside the tables.
There is a need for better clarity on design scenario specifics, including footprint and number of GI.
We need to add per treated impervious area into the titles.
Using i-Tree methodologies, we need to extract empirical equations to estimate residential energy savings.
We need to add another page inside the report citing references and explaining methodologies, especially for qualitative benefits.
Scenario that are going ot be compared to each other will be selected under a UI discussed under #64.
We need to change some of the cost units from millions to thousands.
We decided to drop the property value increase side of co-benefit assessment out, since it is uncertain and is controversial. In other words it relies heavily on sales statistics and do not pass highly credible economic evaluations.