search

Rexko / rexko

Let's make dictionaries!
http://rexko.org/
MIT License
5 stars 1 forks source link

[28] Better support for constructions needed #7

Closed kohath closed 15 years ago

kohath commented 15 years ago

Collocations show, but haphazardly; there needs to be a way to define and act on the relationship between a dictionary and its construction...ary.

kohath commented 15 years ago

The problem: a standard entry may link to its construction fine enough, but the construction also lists the standard words as "constructions" of it (because the standard words show in more than one locus...)

e.g. in the entry for 'candida crystalla' http://laputa:3000/lexemes/139, 'crystallum' appears as a construction, citing all of 'crystallum's loci (even the ones it doesn't appear in—this is a separate bug). It can probably be kludged by requiring a space to appear in a construction... at least until we start working with languages that don't use spaces.

kohath commented 15 years ago

Fixed Lexeme to no longer count fellows without spaces as constructions: 47933ab9febc55cbab3c848779728d8df2251166

Restricting the results to a particular dictionary can already be done (as an argument to Lexeme#constructions).