iceman1001
commented
5 months ago I suspect the name originates from 2010 and this paper. http://www.proxmark.org/files/Documents/13.56%20MHz%20-%20CryptoRF/Dismantling_SecureMemory_CryptoMemory_and_CryptoRF-CCS10.pdf
It been around for some year so we have no need to modify it.
Feel free to contribute and extend the code for "cma_multi".
We welcome pull requests
I suggest to change one of tools name because that is incorrect and Illusory! "cryptorf" tools: https://github.com/RfidResearchGroup/proxmark3/tree/master/tools/cryptorf. I checked source code of this tools, that is about securememory and absolutely not about CryptoRF and CryptoMemory even! That is clear in sma_multi.cpp and sma.cpp completely.
securememory algorithm and security method is so different of cryptoMemory so this tools is not useable for cryptoRF.
can you extend code for "Cma_multi" for example ?