Ribbit-Network / ribbit-network-frog-hardware

The sensor for the world's largest crowdsourced network of open-source, low-cost, GHG Gas Detection Sensors.
https://www.ribbitnetwork.org/
MIT License
94 stars 26 forks source link

Hanging Mechanism Designs #171

Closed eaudiffred closed 1 year ago

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

Opening this issue to improve our sensor hanging features.

@muditprotect3d has already started with some great designs that can be incorporated to the sensor! These are posted in issue #163, but we will continue the conversation here.

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

@muditprotect3d, just following up on some of the designs you posted. These two are my favorites because they seem the most versatile while remaining simple. What ideas do you have on how to integrate them into the sensor? Thanks again for the work you are putting into improving the hanging methods!

image image

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

I was thinking that we should put them onto the back of the enclosure right below the shroud head, but I want to do some experimenting to see where these would fit best!

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-11-20 at 9 43 54 PM
muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Here is a design that I mocked up, the hooks are linear and not curved in this case but another option we could consider

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

Thanks @muditprotect3d. One concern with this is that we are currently printing the enclosure with the back flat on the print bed. We could rotate it 90deg and have the bottom on the print bed, but then I think we will still need supports on the inside.

What do you think about modifying the top of the head to be modular. We could then have multiple types of hooks that the builder can choose from and attach to their frog. Maybe some kind of block and pin? image

If the head isn't the right spot, then maybe the back of the shroud? The multiple different hook designs you've come up with could then be interchangeable.

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

That sounds like a good idea to me, how would we go about making this modular? I think that way we could utilize multiple different hooks and the user could simply decide which ones they wanted to include -- how would they attach them on?

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Then all I would have to do is adjust the dimensions of all the different hook designs to fit the modular fit of the head

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

https://github.com/Ribbit-Network/ribbit-network-frog-sensor/issues/163#issuecomment-1331165501

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Moving comment over here about modular hooks @eaudiffred

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

I was thinking about something like this. But it's kind of bulky.
image

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

#163 (comment)

I like the idea of having multiple options for the user. Are you thinking the frog unit would always remain the same, but then we can design different hooks that latch onto attachment points available on the frog? Like this? (It's very basic, but just an example) image

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Yeah! This is exactly what I meant - this way the user could print whatever hook would fit best for where they want to deploy the sensor and we could make the attachment mechanisms the same

akhilgupta1093 commented 1 year ago

One lingering thought from the meeting-- if we go with the modular hook design, depending on the difficulty, price, and how we end up shipping out the enclosures, it might make sense to print out all of the X hook options ourselves with each enclosure instead of relying on the receiver/orderer to print one of the hooks out, just to make the deployment process easier. I like the idea!

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

@akhilgupta1093 that's a good point! I think that would definitely be something important to consider for the deployment stage. Luckily the hooks should not take much time or material to use!

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-04 at 2 34 59 PM

First modular hook design! -- going to run some test prints at the end of the day and see how they all work

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-04 at 2 55 54 PM

Another design meant for hanging off of a flat surface

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-04 at 3 01 47 PM

Filleted

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

85015A0E-3962-4148-94F0-E6DCEBAFC18E

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

39E999E4-D295-4796-923F-FD3327231FEC Test prints for the two hook designs I made

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Working on making the first design a little larger and come up with 1-2 more designs!

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

Looks great so far @muditprotect3d !

My feedback would be that I think there needs to be a larger retention feature holding the loop of the Frog Sensor's head on the hook. It sometimes gets quite windy where I am located and with the designs you've shown above, I don't feel quite confident that the wind won't blow the Frog off of the hook.

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

@keenanjohnson That's a good point ! for the second design ( wall hook) I tolerance it very tightly so it fits on with very very little movement so I think that one may be fine for that issue but I do agree the S hook would need to be bigger and have a better retention method. If you want to see what I mean with the tolerancing for the wall hook I can attach the STL file here for a test print?

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Or attach it in discord -- GitHub won't let me attach an STL

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

That makes sense, however, I get nervous anytime anyone says that they specified a tight tolerance with a 3D printed part. Given the variability with different 3D printers, it always best to have a backup as well. I believe if you just added an upwards lip on the end of the arm the Frog attaches to that would be sufficient?

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

Something like this:

205512457-67519ec6-4a1c-4b9f-b45d-abbbfbd63338
muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

@keenanjohnson yeah I did not think about that -- very different tolerances from printer to printer. I like that idea and can definitely do that tonight!

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

Or perhaps better yet could be some captive feature like this?

205512457-67519ec6-4a1c-4b9f-b45d-abbbfbd63338
muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

I like this -- I would have to try some test prints to make Sure the sensor can be hooked over it and have enough clearance but can definitely do that!

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-05 at 6 56 52 PM

@keenanjohnson thoughts?

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

or were u thinking more of what you sent in the second picture?

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

Yeah I think that is much better!

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

@muditprotect3d , awesome stuff! A few suggestions. First I'll mimic what you and @keenanjohnson have been discussing about the extension on the end. Maybe try a curve so that the sensor can slide onto the hook (you don't have to worry about 90deg angles that way). I'd also add a large gusset to the corner. That will strengthen the shape.
image

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

On the second one I would try extending the frog side of the hook as far as possible to make it as secure as possible. I agree the top part of the S can be larger too.
image

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-05 at 9 29 38 PM

@keenanjohnson this is what I created here -- the changing width of the extended arm allows the sensor to slide on and slide to the point of tight tolerancing and still has that captive mechanism you mentioned -- doing a test print now!

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

@eaudiffred sorry your comments just loaded for me-- I can add that gusset shape now!, I tried to create that curve through the fillet which should make it easier to slide on but I do think completely getting rid of the 90 degree angle would be better

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-05 at 9 38 17 PM

@eaudiffred @keenanjohnson thoughts?

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-06 at 12 52 31 AM
muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-06 at 12 53 11 AM
muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Updated designs work after talking to @eaudiffred @keenanjohnson

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago
Screen Shot 2022-12-06 at 4 08 00 PM

action shot in assembly

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

IMG_1747 IMG_1748

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Any feedback on these designs? @eaudiffred @keenanjohnson I think they look good, and I can send over the stl files to finalize this

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

S hook works great and increased both ends to secure it more

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Wall hook design edited based on @eaudiffred feedback to a much better design as well

eaudiffred commented 1 year ago

@muditprotect3d both design look good to me. Nice work!

keenanjohnson commented 1 year ago

Looks great to me! Can you share links to the Onshape files so I can add them to our repo?

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Yup! Adding them here now

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

https://cad.onshape.com/documents/a341cd330c0b32e191922629/w/58bdc528ec1788a5da28dcfe/e/d4caabd8158b2b1764e3638f?renderMode=0&uiState=639215a071cc0f1e77ade2a5

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

Both the hooks should be a parts studio on the bottom tab

muditprotect3d commented 1 year ago

@keenanjohnson