Closed Sepidak closed 4 years ago
It appears the issue here was due to the general exclusion filter not being properly applied to the signal being shown (even though the correlation/p-values were correct). This has been fixed and update is available for the pull on Subiculum.
Eye Movement Correlation(individual cell) for many examples the sign and the magnitude of correlation seems off and cells that seem clearly modulated by eye movement are non-sig whereas those that are not are significant. experiment: eye-tracking-corrected-data.mdata. note that the IDs below are with the usage of general filter which is set to exclude all regions except RSPd. pre event signal frame count =2 post event signal frame count = 8 some examples: CA515_B_day2, cell cluster index 39, cell ID 3811: T-to-M has r of -0.0197, whereas the slope is positive. CA514_C_day2, cluster ID 1, cell ID 130,2 M-to-t has r of 0.5237, but here it seems like this should be negative.
CA514_C_day2, cluster ID 6, cell ID 696, T-to-M has r of 0, this doesn't match with the correlation line and the firing rate histogram of this cell. CA514_C_day2, cluster ID 15, cell ID 1019, T-to-M has r of -0.552. Again this is a positive correlation so r should be positive and the firing of this cell seems to be strongly correlated with eye movement but it's not significant!