Make subsections

[RichardLitt]

Possibilities:

• standardizing orthography; viewing and comparing different transcriptions
• grammatical analysis of texts
• multimedia interlinear playing of recordings with free and detailed translation
• version control (a la GitHub)

From ILAT.

[cesine]

Not sure if this helps, but we compared tools using these sections/categories once upon a time, some of these categories might be re-wordable into sections which might be help visitors find relevant libs or codebases that can be repurposed for endangered language work. (the software rows themselves might not be relevant, just the columns)

DataOne also has a list of software that is commonly used for data management by research teams, but which may or may not be designed for use by endangered lang field teams. @RichardLitt if you want to expand to these sorts of software, i can look do the triage to see which are open source http://www.dataone.org/all-software-tools?page=4

[HughP]

That is an interesting list... not because of the content, though that is interesting too, but because of the assumptions it reflects. Excited for tomorrow.

[RichardLitt]

That is a really awesome table. These categories strike me:

• Versioning
• Praat
• ELAN
• Database management

Actually, a repository for all Praat scripts would be amazing.

Of course DataOne has a list of software. I hadn't thought to use their resources. Would you mind traiging? We should prioritize language tools (aka, don't add Joomla! because it's really not relevant to under resourced languages).

[HughP]

You know, for CMS platforms (I use WordPress a lot) and their plugins It would be good if they would aggregate their UI languages. I mean I know people who do a lot of UI / .po translation files in under resourced languages. If these platforms would aggregate that would be awesome.

[RichardLitt]

I'm not actually sure what you mean by aggregate, there.

[RichardLitt]

There are subsections. Closing this as it is not highly actionable.