Closed drahnr closed 4 years ago
I guess you have to rebase in order for CI to work
Done
Ready for review, the concrete impl then will be improved later on once changes for rpgp
hit its repository. The API change for signing bears the advantage for all implementors to having the option not needing to copy data all at once.
This looks good to me. We just have to properly document the fact that the current pgp implementation does satisfy the zero copy expectations of the API yet.
~Contains changes of #12 , so should be merged after that.~
Currently this does not yield much gains, except for avoiding one giant allocation for hashing with md5 -
rpgp
currently does not supportRead
based signing https://github.com/rpgp/rpgp/issues/99 . One could work around this by impl chunk wise hashing by using the lower level API ofpgp
and calling the hasher explicitly, this is not implemented just yet.Ref #11