Open seth586 opened 4 years ago
Hi @seth586 there is one concern I have on your proposal. With the balance score ranging from -1 to +1, you lose the ability to sort on your grids based on the balancedness of the channels. The current scoring mechanism, makes it easy to sort your most balanced channels easily.
Currently, a balance score of, say 1, can mean two things: either all the funds are on my side or on their side. Sorting channels by balance score is not currently useful or informative.
A balance score should illustrate balance in either direction.
A -1 to +1 score would illustrate balance in a specific direction.
-1 = all the balance is on my side
+1 = all the balance in on my peers side
0 = perfectly balanced
lndmanage uses this scoring system and it makes sense.