search

Rigellute / spotify-tui

Spotify for the terminal written in Rust 🚀
MIT License
17.62k stars 526 forks source link

Windows/Linux/macOS package managers #160

Open Rigellute opened 5 years ago

Rigellute commented 5 years ago

If anyone knows how we can use the various package managers, please let me know!

ghost commented 5 years ago

I use ubuntu 18.04 and I can install the lastest spotify-tui with following command; snap install spt --channel edge.

To install through snap, no configuration is required and I think this is easy enough for ubuntu users (Sorry, I have never used other distributions and I do not know about them). Or, woud you like to use other package manager like apt instead of snap?

tem1029 commented 5 years ago

Made a start in #161.

Rigellute commented 5 years ago

Thank you both for this info.

zenofile commented 5 years ago

I made a copr repository for Fedora containing spotifyd and spotify-tui as an alternative to using snaps, intended for personal use, and plan to keep it recent. But feel free to use the SPEC as a template or start for building your own RPMs.

It can be installed after a dnf copr enable zeno/spotify-rust with dnf install spotify-tui.

jwijenbergh commented 5 years ago

I am the package maintainer for the spotify-tui nix package (nix is the package manager used by NixOS). I will keep the package there up to date as long as I can. The package is currently in the unstable channel of Nix and is added to the stable channel when a new stable channel version comes out.

The nix package manager can be used on all distributions.

trames57 commented 5 years ago

For Archlinux, there is already a package maintained in the AUR (Archlinux user repository). I am not the maintainer, but here is the link. It is kept updated fairly regularly. I would guess that version 0.10.0 will be updated soon.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spotify-tui/

Rigellute commented 5 years ago

Awesome, thanks @zenofile @jwijenbergh and @trames57 .

Please feel free to add the installation instructions for these package managers to our README.

D-Nice commented 5 years ago

Void Linux: https://github.com/Rigellute/spotify-tui/pull/185

Odilhao commented 4 years ago

I'll start to work on the flatpak version.

ericonr commented 4 years ago

@Odilhao have you started working on it? I'm looking into learning Flatpak packaging and would be interested in helping!

Update: I'm no longer interested in this.

hurricanehrndz commented 4 years ago

I noticed SPT is not actually pushed to snap stores from commits here? Is there any interest in this?

AivreeG commented 4 years ago

I've been interested in it, but Alan Pope (@popey) uploaded it originally, and I'm not sure how it would be able to transfer to another maintainer.

hurricanehrndz commented 4 years ago

Aivree,

I can talk to Alan, about it. If you are interested I'd be happy to take it on.

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:38 PM Aivree notifications@github.com wrote:

I've been interested in it, but Alan Pope (@popey https://github.com/popey) uploaded it originally, and I'm not sure how it would be able to transfer to another maintainer.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Rigellute/spotify-tui/issues/160?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABMJBTN4ZEDXVLQBIJYHVMDRAIHPTA5CNFSM4JQRO6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEKJFGXY#issuecomment-580014943, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMJBTPEZ6IVCQLCEM26TK3RAIHPTANCNFSM4JQRO6NQ .

-- Regards,

Carlos Hernandez

Odilhao commented 4 years ago

@Odilhao have you started working on it? I'm looking into learning Flatpak packaging and would be interested in helping!

I've already started to work on it, just commited this repo , I'm trying to set the PATH with the installation, after that I'll send one PR to the upstream flathub.

popey commented 4 years ago

@AivreeG @hurricanehrndz happy to transfer spt over to an upstream developer. Just let me know who has the account, and I'll put the request in to transfer it :D

Apologies for not updating the snap, this was an error in my monitoring / build system. It should be up to date now and will be kept up to date.

Roadmaster commented 4 years ago

Hey folks, There's a pending dispute/transfer request (filed Feb 8th) by someone who looks like @hurricanehrndz . Are you (people from the spotify-tui project, potentially @Rigellute) OK with him owning the snap package? do you want someone else to own it?

Let me know.

Rigellute commented 4 years ago

Thanks @Roadmaster. Fine by me!

hurricanehrndz commented 4 years ago

@Rigellute,

Once the transfer is complete, I will re-release you're last release. From there on workflows can do release into the beta channel.

jtagcat commented 4 years ago

Windows: https://scoop.sh/

Rigellute commented 4 years ago

Would love to use scoop, contributions for setting it up are very much appreciated!

jtagcat commented 4 years ago

Would love to use scoop, contributions for setting it up are very much appreciated!

I'm somewhat familiar with it (I tried to add Cronical, but it integrates with the Windows system very closely with admin permissions and the way it does that would be user-configurable and ...), if I you ping me once a week, I might have the time and mood to do everything.

I'm not exactly sure, if spotify-tui should go to the main or extras bucket The questionable criteria are:

note to self: if I do get around adding spotify-tui, add id.ee as well (got to have the national pride of somewhat broken security)

garyng commented 4 years ago

Maybe on Windows for chocolatey as well? https://chocolatey.org/docs/create-packages

jtagcat commented 4 years ago

Maybe on Windows for chocolatey as well? https://chocolatey.org/docs/create-packages

https://github.com/lukesampson/scoop/wiki/Chocolatey-Comparison

In addition, I'm not familiar with packaging to Choco.

littleli commented 4 years ago

I beg your pardon. Here is my scoop bucket with spotify-tui https://github.com/littleli/scoop-garage I don't think it belongs to the main bucket. Maybe scoop-extras, or even create your own bucket, it's fairly easy.

Rigellute commented 4 years ago

Nice one @littleli! Are you able to make a pull request adding your work to this repo?

littleli commented 4 years ago

Nice one @littleli! Are you able to make a pull request adding your work to this repo?

I would suggest:

  1. creating a new repository scoop-bucket managed by you, you can reuse it eventually for your other projects you want to be installable this way
  2. I submit the spotify-tui manifest in the repo
  3. I (or you) can update installation instructions to spotify-tui repo

The reason for (1) is that scoop uses git as a distribution mechanism, so manifests should be in general in separate repos (buckets) without source code.

Rigellute commented 4 years ago

@littleli thanks again, are you able to look over this repo and see if it's all good? https://github.com/Rigellute/scoop-bucket

Feel free to add to the docs

littleli commented 4 years ago

Looks good. Also see this PR with the first version bump.

silas229 commented 2 years ago

Winget is the new package manager for Windows 10 and Windows 11 https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli

russellbanks commented 2 years ago

Winget is the new package manager for Windows 10 and Windows 11 https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli

Would love to see this on Winget! Packages can be submitted via the winget-pkgs repo.

littleli commented 2 years ago

@russellbanks

It seems standalone executables (including zipped ones) are not yet supported. Quote from the project description:

Note: At this time installers must either be MSIX, MSI or .exe application installers. Standalone or portable executables, > compressed .zip files, and fonts are not currently supported.

russellbanks commented 2 years ago

@russellbanks

It seems standalone executables (including zipped ones) are not yet supported. Quote from the project description:

Note: At this time installers must either be MSIX, MSI or .exe application installers. Standalone or portable executables, > compressed .zip files, and fonts are not currently supported.

Couldn't we create an installer for this program with a utility such as Inno Setup? One example of a project that has done this is Onefetch where they used a workflow to create an installer for their Rust project using Inno Setup, which was then able to be submitted to winget-pkgs.

jonasnordlund commented 2 years ago

@russellbanks

It seems standalone executables (including zipped ones) are not yet supported. Quote from the project description:

Note: At this time installers must either be MSIX, MSI or .exe application installers. Standalone or portable executables, > compressed .zip files, and fonts are not currently supported.

Winget 1.3 is now released as stable (release notes) and the headline feature might be support for portable/standalone apps. I think they implemented it so that winget automatically adds whatever shims it wants to as if it was e.g. MSIX installed.

russellbanks commented 2 years ago

Winget 1.3 is now released as stable (release notes) and the headline feature might be support for portable/standalone apps.

This is only standalone .exe files at the moment. Support for zipped files are coming in Winget 1.4.