Truckee strategy map iterations

[kwilsonh2o]

Hello Braden,

Attached is a revised table for the strategy map iteration for the Truckee River based on yesterday's conversation with Wally and Rodd.

Kristen

BRAT legend 3.19.2019.xlsx

[banderson1618]

Here's the layer package that we get for management with that setup, except for without the land use stuff (because I haven't figured out how to get that as an input). Let me know what you think.

Management.zip

[kwilsonh2o]

Something strange is happening. What was showing up as 'medium restoration-veg' is now showing as 'low restoration'. 'Medium restoration' and 'high restoration' reaches are missing. None of the restoration criteria changed. I'm guessing this is due to trying to use the road crossing layer only (iPC_Roadx). Please try with the combined conflicts layer, see attached.

Strategies to promote beaver dam building	risk	historic departure dams	historic potential dams (OCC_HPE)	current potential dams (OCC_ET)	OCC_HPE/OCC_EX	historic veg departure (OVC_PT-OVC_ET)	land use	infra-structure
Relocation and conservation	split into individual risk factors	-	≥15	≥15	-		no urban	>100
High restoration potential	-	≥5	≥5, <15	>1		no urban
High restoration - veg first		≥5	≥5, <15	>1	≥5	no urban
Medium restoration	-	≥5	<5	>1		no urban
Medium restoration - veg first		≥5	<5	>1	≥5	no urban
Low restoration		≥1, <5	<5	>1		no urban
Low restoration potential - veg first	-	≥1, <5	<5	>1	≥5	no urban
Living with beaver solutions - infrastructure			≥5	-		-	oPC_Dist≤30
Living with beaver solutions - urban and ag use				≥5	-		urban or ag

BRAT legend 3.20.2019.xlsx

[kwilsonh2o]

The table didn't copy here correctly. Please look at the excel spreadsheet attached. The table is dated 3.20.19.

[banderson1618]

Management.zip

[kwilsonh2o]

Looks good Braden. Is it possible to run a few other watersheds to see how it does across the state? Tomales Bay, South Fork Kern, North Fork Feather, and Shasta

[banderson1618]

Here's Tomales Bay:

Management.zip

I'll try to run at least two more today, and post them here when they're complete.

[kwilsonh2o]

Awesome. Will run this past project partners to get their feedback.

[banderson1618]

Here's South Fork Kern:

Management.zip

[banderson1618]

North Fork Feather:

Management.zip

[banderson1618]

Shasta:

Management.zip

[kwilsonh2o]

Thank you. Will set up a time to share with project partners and get their input. I’m out of the office through Thursday this week.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:23 PM, Braden Anderson notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Shasta:

Management.ziphttps://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/files/3005096/Management.zip

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/issues/269#issuecomment-476342153, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Aue0GA1-qzAK9Kg_l8ttiCNbQUlbFgbLks5vaSIwgaJpZM4b9dEd.

[banderson1618]

Carson:

Management.zip

[kwilsonh2o]

Downloaded them all and am sending to partners to review by the end of next week. The Tomales Bay results are showing the Truckee. Please send Tomales again when you have a chance.

[kwilsonh2o]

Hello Braden,

Two more watersheds to vet the strategy map with partners ... Big Chico Creek and Butte Creek. Thank you.

Kristen

[kwilsonh2o]

Another model iteration for Truckee. Please run the Truckee using these values. Please label it Campos. BRAT strategy map legend_BRC.xlsx

[bangen]

Including the final strategy map legend for reference

BRAT_StrategyMapLegend_6.7.19_Doc.xlsx