Closed philipbaileynar closed 5 years ago
Yes, I'll work on this.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:49 PM Philip Bailey notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #284 https://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/issues/284 to @wally-mac https://github.com/wally-mac.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/issues/284#event-2325714849, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFHZAUTQWDFVVER4CTA4MOTPUIBQBANCNFSM4HLNBQFQ .
-- Wally Macfarlane 435.512.1839
@philipbaileynar I'm looking at the layer package we sent you and it looks like I'm mistaken; the fields in your layers/shapefiles are based off the old BRAT model so they're slightly different. SegID
is the old equivalent of ReachID
, we did not have dam count estimates (mCC_EX_CT
and mCC_Hpe_CT
) just density estimates (oCC_EX
and oCC_HPE
), and our management outputs were beaver management zones oPBRC
and conflict potential oPC_Score
(again based off risk of damage to infrastructure). If these fields will work for your purposes, I can get them to you shortly. The new BRAT model will be run on these watersheds in the next week or two, so around then I can get the new outputs to you as well.
ShapeFiles provided by @wally-mac did the trick and we were able to produce a demo web map for Idaho BRAT.
Despite help from @mhallerud I was unable to find several of the attributes required in the Big Wood BRAT project that I downloaded from box.
@wally-mac can one of your team produce and send me two ShapeFiles, one for Big Wood and one for Little Wood. Each ShapeFile should have only the following attributes: