Paper form for BRAT-cIS

[joewheaton]

Related to #35, we need a paper form for BRAT.

[joewheaton]

Okay here they are: BRAT_cIS Asessment Form_Advanced.docx BRAT_cIS Asessment Form_Basic.docx

[nick4rivers]

@joewheaton I'm kick these out now, stay tuned

[nick4rivers]

Yo @joewheaton Huge if statements, amazed it actually works in Survey123

if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Unsuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Unsuitable','None',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='BarelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Unsuitable','Rare',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Unsuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Suitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Unsuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Preferred' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Unsuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Unsuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='BarelySuitable','Rare',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='BarelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='BarelySuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='BarelySuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Suitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='BarelySuitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Preferred' and ${RiparianVegetation}='BarelySuitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Unsuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='BarelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable','Rare',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Suitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Preferred' and ${RiparianVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable','Pervasive',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Unsuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Suitable','Rare',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='BarelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Suitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Suitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Suitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Suitable','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Preferred' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Suitable','Pervasive',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Unsuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Preferred','Occassional',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='BarelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Preferred','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='ModeratelySuitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Preferred','Frequent',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Suitable' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Preferred','Pervasive',if(${StreamsideVegetation}='Preferred' and ${RiparianVegetation}='Preferred','Pervasive','Pervasive'))))))))))))))))))))))))))

[nick4rivers]

@joewheaton and @wally-mac here's a first cut at a BRAT app. This will get cleaned up a bit, but feel free to offer feedback here:

https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/44f9c3e1c8744ff9a07d2e0c9f7f5173/data

[wally-mac]

@webernick79, this is what I get when I try to log in with my USU ARCGIS account

[wally-mac]

@webernick79 if I sign off from my USU account I'm able to access the form. I think this is a really nice start. The main thing I think it needs is additional options for dominate vegetation. I can work on pulling this together if would like.

[nick4rivers]

@wally-mac , Yes, send veg options.

@joewheaton and @wally-mac Can you guys consider the last couple of questions on the CURRENT FORM. Do we need the additional choices in the gradient questions (i.e. Can build - inferred, Can build - evidence). Every additional choice adds another 50 if statements? That is, can we just keep it at:

• Cannot Build - Too Steep
• Cannot Build - Too Flat
• Probably Can Build
• Can Built

Also, what do the "-" represent in the columns of Table 3

[wally-mac]

@webernick79, Here is a png file that shows beaver dam building material preferences

[wally-mac]

@webernick79 as for your question on gradient I think the categories you have are sufficient but it would be good if @joewheaton weighed in.

[nick4rivers]

@wally-mac This looks like now veg is a single question? In @joewheaton Joe's FORM it is posed as two questions? Suitability and type? To me this is one questions so I'm going to simplify

[nick4rivers]

Ya'll have a better BRAT image file as well? This one is tiny

Actually I found one, no worries

[nick4rivers]

Hey @joewheaton and @wally-mac , updated form here: https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/44f9c3e1c8744ff9a07d2e0c9f7f5173?open=menu

Slightly simplified and basically just follows table 2 and 3, which is pretty essential if you want the logic built in to make the capacity call. Tear it down and let me know what to change.

On another note, I'm also realizing that Survey123 is actually pretty capable at editing existing layers. Not totally sure about line segments, but I'll test it out.

[wally-mac]

@webernick79 I just gave the app a test drive and it works great for me. @joewheaton and @bangen what do you both think? Nice work Nick!

[wally-mac]

One addition thing I think that we should add to the form is the question: Is the stream too large for a beaver to build a dam? In the pyBRAT code we deal with this question by applying an upstream drainage area threshold value because we found that sometimes the Q2 stream power wasn’t enough to catch these large Streams that have no capacity for beaver dams.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:55 PM Nick Weber notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey @joewheaton https://github.com/joewheaton and @wally-mac https://github.com/wally-mac , updated form here:

https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/44f9c3e1c8744ff9a07d2e0c9f7f5173?open=menu

Slightly simplified and basically just follows table 2 and 3, which is pretty essential if you want the logic built in to make the capacity call. Tear it down and let me know what to change.

On another note, I'm also realizing that Survey123 is actually pretty capable at editing existing layers. Not totally sure about line segments, but I'll test it out.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Riverscapes/pyBRAT/issues/42#issuecomment-389310317, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AU-QUnptGQaM9NWrYj61qLy7SLgmAtmMks5ty0C7gaJpZM4T-E8t .

-- Sent from Gmail Mobile Sorry for typos and brevity courtesy of my 'smart' phone.

[joewheaton]

Duplicate with #35....