Open danielasun opened 6 years ago
Most URDFs don't have joint names given as 'jointX', which is the preferred convention for this library. Possibly consider adding a feature to accept a joint name mapping that is converted internally for usage?
Most URDFs don't have joint names given as 'jointX', which is the preferred convention for this library. Possibly consider adding a feature to accept a joint name mapping that is converted internally for usage?