HTTP URLs opened from bookmarks should not be upgraded to HTTPS

[fmarier]

Here's another case that seems to be upgraded unnecessarily:

1. bookmark an HTTP-only site, for example http://bholley.net/blog/2015/mozpromise.html
2. use the awesomebar to navigate to it
3. notice how you are taken to https://bholley.net/blog/2015/mozpromise.html

[fmarier]

Actually, the problem seems larger than the above scenario.

On 0.4.3, if I do the following

1. type Ctrl+l to focus the address bar
2. clear the existing contents
3. type "http://example.com"

then I am taken to "https://example.com" instead of "http://example.com".

[Rob--W]

This is due to limitations of the extension API. For bookmarks I could try to detect whether a host name is bookmarked, and if if so, if there is at least one https-URL before redirecting.

For the case of non-bookmarked domains, there is no side channel that I can use to determine whether the user typed "http://" or nothing. Would the ability to forcidbly navigate to http (e.g. typing "h example.com" -> "http://example.com") be a good option for you?

[cben]

Sounds like a deep limitation :-( Would this be enough grounds to reopen https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370388 ?

[Rob--W]

@cben That bug hasn't been closed yet. Though even if the linked bugs get resolved (i.e. we can distinguish typed navigations from non-typed navigations), then we still have the problem of detecting typed example.com from typed http://example.com.

[fmarier]

I'm starting to suspect that perhaps the best way to replicate the original behaviour would be to use the code from the original add-on to make a patch in gecko directly (behind an about:config pref).

[Gitoffthelawn]

I think, at the least, this extension needs an option to allow opening http bookmarks with http. I regularly go through http bookmarks to see if https is available for them, and manually update them if available. I (unfortunately) have hundreds of http bookmarks, and adding all their domains to this extension (and deleting them as they convert to https) would be time consuming.

BTW, another useful extension to create would be one that goes through all bookmarks and sees if https is available for them. The only trick is that a screenshot would have to be taken of both the http and https versions to compare them. Some sites will load on https, but the content is broken.

[Rob--W]

(this is off-topic)

BTW, another useful extension to create would be one that goes through all bookmarks and sees if https is available for them. The only trick is that a screenshot would have to be taken of both the http and https versions to compare them. Some sites will load on https, but the content is broken.

This is something that can easily be done with an extension. But instead of using a screenshot, I would suggest to just confirm that the request succeeds successfully, or at most compare the response text. Comparing by screenshots is complicated and easily defeated when the result has dynamic content, e.g. embedded adverts.

To get started with developing extensions, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions and for your specific use case, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Work_with_the_Bookmarks_API