Closed benfowler closed 8 years ago
Thx for your effort. I will definitely merge it. Could you please add a documentation of it in the README?
@RobWin: cheers!
README
shortly and then ask you afterards to take another look at this PR.$ref
s). Do you have any thoughts on what you'd like to see done to make this useful and effective?
This pull request is a first attempt to give
assertj-swagger
users a little bit of finer control on what assertions are tested. Changes outlined below.@RobWin : happy to rework this as needed, to get this into sufficiently good state to merge. Looking, especially, feedback on whether you think I've gone about making these changes sensibly, and what could be improved.
SwaggerAssertionType
). This is to work around imperfect normalization of definition attribute type checks that are referenced through$ref
(however, some groundwork has been laid to rectify the latter)consumes
andproduces
values (AttributeResolver
inner class); this can be extended later to normalize type references through$ref
, etc