Closed Robbepop closed 5 years ago
I think in between the crate reorganization PR and the unchecked_internals
PR I will do this and maybe fix up the error type too. Should we release a new version right after the reorganization PR or do we want to wait?
Or I could rebase the crate reorganization PR commits to include this since it is messing with imports anyway?
Or I could rebase the crate reorganization PR commits to include this since it is messing with imports anyway?
let us please do that in a separate PR. as I have said I really want to keep PRs as small as possible for better reviewability and this one is already giantic.
I think it would be best to wait a bit for a release after the dust of all the new implementations and refactorings has settled down. Or what do you think?
I think it would be best to wait a bit for a release after the dust of all the new implementations and refactorings has settled down. Or what do you think? Yes this is what I think
Implemented by https://github.com/Robbepop/apint/pull/50.
Implemented. Closed.
The types provided by
apint
could be also available usinglibcore
only. Maybe we would need to cross-out some features but all in all it should be possible.This issue proposes to add the
std
crate feature. It is supposed to be enabled by default:default = ["std"]
Users can opt-in to uselibcore
instead of standard lib by importingapint
without default features:In this issue we can track which APIs shall be available to
#[no_std]
scenarios.