kysely-bun-worker vs kysely-bun-sqlite

[angelxmoreno]

kysely-bun-worker and kysely-bun-sqlite are two different dialects that work with bun:sqlite. However, internally the naming used for the kysely-bun-worker dialect is called bun-sqlite. At first glance the name implies that kysely-bun-sqlite is what is used internally. It took me sometime to figure out why my setup wasn't working because of this confusion.

In my app I am using kysely-bun-sqlite and I am unable to use codegen. I'd like to propose we rename the current dialect from bun-sqlite to bun-sqlite-worker and include the kysely-bun-sqlite dialect to avoid future confusion.

Upvote & Fund

• We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
• We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
• Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.

[njoshi22]

Actually just saw the same thing with postgres too - the schema files in both were different (one was updated, one was not).